Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.D1778G
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.D1778G

Associated Papers

Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.

So MK et al.

Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024

39767183 (PubMed )
Supplement: diagnostics-14-02821-s001.zip › diagnostics-3307629-supplementary_Table.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_S1

In Silico Prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants with Conflicting Clinical Interpretation in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.

Stella S et al.

Genes, 2024

Protein-folding chaperones predict structure-function relationships and cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Gracia B et al.

Cell Reports, 2024

BRCA1 frameshift variants leading to extended incorrect protein C termini.

Nepomuceno TC et al.

Hgg Advances, 2023

37718511 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc1.pdf

Protein-Folding Chaperones Predict Structure-Function Relationships and Cancer Risk in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers.

Gracia B et al.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology, 2023

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Protein domains provide a new layer of information for classifying human variations in rare diseases.

Corcuff M et al.

Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2023

36896423 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.XLSX › Supplementary_Table_1

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

Assessment of small in-frame indels and C-terminal nonsense variants of BRCA1 using a validated functional assay.

Nepomuceno TC et al.

Scientific Reports, 2022

36171434 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2022_20500_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

An integrative model for the comprehensive classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Iversen ES et al.

Npj Genomic Medicine, 2022

35665744 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41525_2022_302_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › BRCA1_inSilico_PCs___AGVGD

Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Dorling L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2022

35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15

Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.

Pasche E et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022

35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf

Identification of pathogenic variants in cancer genes using base editing screens with editing efficiency correction.

Huang C et al.

Genome Biology, 2021

33691754 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2021_2305_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx › Table_S6

A Case Report of Germline Compound Heterozygous Mutations in the BRCA1 Gene of an Ovarian and Breast Cancer Patient.

Kwong A et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021

Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide.

Hirotsu Y et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020

32486089 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-21-03895-s001.zip › Supplemental_Table_2.xlsx › Momozawa_et_al.

Spectrum of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants Identified in 2351 Ovarian and Breast Cancer Patients Referring to a Reference Cancer Hospital of Rome.

Santonocito C et al.

Cancers, 2020

Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".

Dines JN et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020

31911673 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_740_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › 1._Used_in_analysis

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Toward automation of germline variant curation in clinical cancer genetics.

Ravichandran V et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019

30787465 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1525468-supplement-Large_Excel_File.xlsx › Table_S6

Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.

Bhaskaran SP et al.

International Journal of Cancer, 2019

30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › BRCA1_ethnic_source_

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.

Yost S et al.

Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019

31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_1

Corrigendum: Novel diagnostic tool for prediction of variant spliceogenicity derived from a set of 395 combined in silico/in vitro studies: an international collaborative effort.

Leman R et al.

Nucleic Acids Research, 2018

30321405 (PubMed )
Supplement: gky979_supplemental_files.zip › Corrigendum_supplementary_table.xlsx › AllData

Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.

Findlay GM et al.

Nature, 2018

30209399 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1501643-supplement-3.xlsx › Conflicting_interpretations

Novel diagnostic tool for prediction of variant spliceogenicity derived from a set of 395 combined in silico/in vitro studies: an international collaborative effort.

Leman R et al.

Nucleic Acids Research, 2018

29750258 (PubMed )
Supplement: gky372_supplemental_files.zip › SPiCE_table_supp.R2.xlsx › Table_S2

Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.

Ernst C et al.

Bmc Medical Genomics, 2018

29580235 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12920_2018_353_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Classified_Variant_Set

A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.

Qian D et al.

Plos One, 2018

30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants

Computational Tools for Splicing Defect Prediction in Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes: How Efficient Are They at Predicting RNA Alterations?

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2018

30233647 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_1.XLSX › Supplem_Table_2

Functional assays provide a robust tool for the clinical annotation of genetic variants of uncertain significance.

Woods NT et al.

Npj Genomic Medicine, 2016

28781887 (PubMed )
Supplement: npjgenmed20161-s1.pdf

Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types.

Lu C et al.

Nature Communications, 2015

Splicing analysis of 14 BRCA1 missense variants classifies nine variants as pathogenic.

Ahlborn LB et al.

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015

1–50 of 63 papers
Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."