Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.D1778Splc
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.D1778Splc

Associated Papers

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

Comparison of In Silico Tools for Splice-Altering Variant Prediction Using Established Spliceogenic Variants: An End-User's Point of View.

Jang W et al.

International Journal of Genomics, 2022

36275637 (PubMed )
Supplement: 5265686.f1.docx

Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders.

Rowlands C et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34663891 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_99747_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table-S1-modified

Blood RNA analysis can increase clinical diagnostic rate and resolve variants of uncertain significance.

Wai HA et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020

32123317 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2020_766_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Variant_summary

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

Computational Tools for Splicing Defect Prediction in Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes: How Efficient Are They at Predicting RNA Alterations?

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2018

30233647 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_1.XLSX › Supplem_Table_6

Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Pipeline Outperforms a Combined Approach Using Sanger Sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification in Targeted Gene Panel Analysis.

Schenkel LC et al.

The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : Jmd, 2016

Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."