Associated Papers
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.
Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
40233743 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Hoja1
Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.
Padigepati SR et al.
Human Genetics, 2024
39085601 (PubMed )
Supplement: 439_2024_2691_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › BRCA1
Protein-folding chaperones predict structure-function relationships and cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
Gracia B et al.
Cell Reports, 2024
38368609 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1970903-supplement-3.xlsx › Table_S2
BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation analysis from a cohort of 1267 patients at high risk for breast cancer in Brazil.
Mazzonetto P et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_4.xlsx › Sheet1
Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".
Dines JN et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
31911673 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_740_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › 1._Used_in_analysis
Identification of twenty-nine novel germline unclassified variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 1400 Italian individuals.
Santonocito C et al.
Breast (edinburgh, Scotland), 2017
Selecting for BRCA1 testing using a combination of homogeneous selection criteria and immunohistochemical characteristics of breast cancers.
Miolo G et al.
Bmc Cancer, 2009
Select a paper to view details