Associated Papers
Profiling BRCA1-BRCT interactions and their functional relevance at amino acid resolution.
Mangkusaputra V et al.
Nucleic Acids Research, 2025
The Causal Pivot: A structural approach to genetic heterogeneity and variant discovery in complex diseases.
Shaw CA et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.
Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.
Padigepati SR et al.
Human Genetics, 2024
Protein-folding chaperones predict structure-function relationships and cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
Gracia B et al.
Cell Reports, 2024
BRCA1 frameshift variants leading to extended incorrect protein C termini.
Nepomuceno TC et al.
Hgg Advances, 2023
Protein-Folding Chaperones Predict Structure-Function Relationships and Cancer Risk in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers.
Gracia B et al.
Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology, 2023
Ethnic-specificity, evolution origin and deleteriousness of Asian BRCA variation revealed by over 7500 BRCA variants derived from Asian population.
Qin Z et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2023
Assessment of small in-frame indels and C-terminal nonsense variants of BRCA1 using a validated functional assay.
Nepomuceno TC et al.
Scientific Reports, 2022
An integrative model for the comprehensive classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain clinical significance.
Iversen ES et al.
Npj Genomic Medicine, 2022
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
Quantifying prediction of pathogenicity for within-codon concordance (PM5) using 7541 functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2 missense variants.
Loong L et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022
Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A et al.
Cancers, 2021
Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".
Dines JN et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Bhaskaran SP et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2019
Combining Homologous Recombination and Phosphopeptide-binding Data to Predict the Impact of BRCA1 BRCT Variants on Cancer Risk.
Petitalot A et al.
Molecular Cancer Research : Mcr, 2019
Functional assays provide a robust tool for the clinical annotation of genetic variants of uncertain significance.
Woods NT et al.
Npj Genomic Medicine, 2016
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
Probing structure-function relationships in missense variants in the carboxy-terminal region of BRCA1.
Carvalho RS et al.
Plos One, 2014
Missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) altering the phosphorylation patterns of BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Tram E et al.
Plos One, 2013
Structure-Function Of The Tumor Suppressor BRCA1.
Clark SL et al.
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2012
A computational method to classify variants of uncertain significance using functional assay data with application to BRCA1.
Iversen ES et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2011
Comprehensive analysis of missense variations in the BRCT domain of BRCA1 by structural and functional assays.
Lee MS et al.
Cancer Research, 2010
BRCT domains: phosphopeptide binding and signaling modules.
Rodriguez MC et al.
Frontiers in Bioscience : a Journal and Virtual Library, 2008
"Similarity trap" in protein-protein interactions could be carcinogenic: simulations of p53 core domain complexed with 53BP1 and BRCA1 BRCT domains.
Liu J et al.
Structure (london, England : 1993), 2006
Insights into the molecular basis of human hereditary breast cancer from studies of the BRCA1 BRCT domain.
Glover JN
Familial Cancer, 2006
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.
Abkevich V et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004
Structure-based assessment of missense mutations in human BRCA1: implications for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition.
Mirkovic N et al.
Cancer Research, 2004
Structural basis of phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCT domain of BRCA1.
Williams RS et al.
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2004
Detection of protein folding defects caused by BRCA1-BRCT truncation and missense mutations.
Williams RS et al.
The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003
A mutation analysis of the BRCA1 gene in 140 families from southeast France with a history of breast and/or ovarian cancer.
Rostagno P et al.
Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
The BRCA1 C-terminal domain: structure and function.
Huyton T et al.
Mutation Research, 2000