Associated Papers
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
39767183 (PubMed )
Supplement: diagnostics-14-02821-s001.zip › diagnostics-3307629-supplementary_Table.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_S1
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
A Population-Based Analysis of BRCA1/2 Genes and Associated Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in Korean Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Park KS et al.
Cancers, 2021
34063308 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-02192-s001.zip › cancers-1174339-supplementary.xlsx › Table_S6
Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".
Dines JN et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
31911673 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_740_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › 1._Used_in_analysis
Predicting the Disease Risk of Protein Mutation Sequences With Pre-training Model.
Li K et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2020
Identification of a Novel BRCA1 Pathogenic Mutation in Korean Patients Following Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants According to the ACMG Standards and Guidelines Using Relevant Ethnic Controls.
Park JS et al.
Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017
Suggestion of BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.L1780P) variant confer from 'unknown significance' to 'Likely pathogenic' based on clinical evidence in Korea.
Ryu JM et al.
Breast (edinburgh, Scotland), 2017
Select a paper to view details