Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.S1101N
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.S1101N

Associated Papers

The Causal Pivot: A structural approach to genetic heterogeneity and variant discovery in complex diseases.

Shaw CA et al.

American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025

40829599 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Annotations

VarMeter2: An enhanced structure-based method for predicting pathogenic missense variants through Mahalanobis distance.

Ohno S et al.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2025

40160862 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Sheet1

Pathogenic variants in human DNA damage repair genes mostly arose in recent human history.

Zhao B et al.

Bmc Cancer, 2024

38575974 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12885_2024_12160_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Tuberous sclerosis complex mutations in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Observations on phenotypic and treatment-related associations.

Navale P et al.

Virchows Archiv : an International Journal of Pathology, 2023

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants

Ethnic-specificity, evolution origin and deleteriousness of Asian BRCA variation revealed by over 7500 BRCA variants derived from Asian population.

Qin Z et al.

International Journal of Cancer, 2023

36385461 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-152-1159-s009.xlsx › Benign

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.

Keskin Karakoyun H et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2023

36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

MARGINAL: An Automatic Classification of Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes Using a Machine Learning Model.

Karalidou V et al.

Biomolecules, 2022

36358902 (PubMed )
Supplement: biomolecules-12-01552-s001.zip › final_annotation_file_CanVaS.xlsx › Sheet1

BRCA1 Norway: comparison of classification for BRCA1 germline variants detected in families with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer between different laboratories.

Hovland HN et al.

Familial Cancer, 2022

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.

Qorri E et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022

35887294 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-07946-s001.zip › Supplementary_Table_S3.xlsx › BRCA1_Dataset

Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Dorling L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2022

35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15

Human BRCA pathogenic variants were originated during recent human history.

Li J et al.

Life Science Alliance, 2022

35165121 (PubMed )
Supplement: LSA-2021-01263_TableS1.xlsx › Sheet3

Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.

Pasche E et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022

35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf

Sensitivity and specificity of loss of heterozygosity analysis for the classification of rare germline variants in BRCA1/2: results of the observational AGO-TR1 study (NCT02222883).

Hauke J et al.

Journal of Medical Genetics, 2022

33273034 (PubMed )
Supplement: jmedgenet-2020-107353supp001.pdf

Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.

Reza MN et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1

Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment and Treatment Stratification with Hybrid Capture-Based Panel Sequencing.

Szymansky A et al.

Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2021

34442335 (PubMed )
Supplement: jpm-11-00691-s001.zip › S15-SNVs_routine_cohort.xlsx › SNVs_Bigcohort

Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Cancers, 2021

34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A

Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.

Özkan S et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021

34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4

Comparison of three commercial decision support platforms for matching of next-generation sequencing results with therapies in patients with cancer.

Perakis SO et al.

Esmo Open, 2020

32967919 (PubMed )
Supplement: esmoopen-2020-000872supp001.pdf

Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".

Dines JN et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020

31911673 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_740_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › 1._Used_in_analysis

The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome.

Ochoa D et al.

Nature Biotechnology, 2020

31819260 (PubMed )
Supplement: EMS84831-supplement-Table_S5.xlsx › clinvar_data

Predicting the Disease Risk of Protein Mutation Sequences With Pre-training Model.

Li K et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2020

33408741 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_2.XLSX › Sheet1

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.

Yost S et al.

Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019

31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_2

Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.

Brown AL et al.

Plos Computational Biology, 2019

31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark

Clinical Implications of Plasma-Based Genotyping With the Delivery of Personalized Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Aggarwal C et al.

Jama Oncology, 2019

Population and breast cancer patients' analysis reveals the diversity of genomic variation of the BRCA genes in the Mexican population.

Fernández-Lopez JC et al.

Human Genomics, 2019

30630528 (PubMed )
Supplement: 40246_2018_188_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Hoja1

Somatic mutations in benign breast disease tissue and risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer.

Rohan TE et al.

British Journal of Cancer, 2018

29872146 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41416_2018_89_MOESM2_ESM.xls › Table_2a

Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.

Ernst C et al.

Bmc Medical Genomics, 2018

29580235 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12920_2018_353_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Classified_Variant_Set

A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.

Qian D et al.

Plos One, 2018

30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants

Functional and mutational landscapes of BRCA1 for homology-directed repair and therapy resistance.

Anantha RW et al.

Elife, 2017

Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types.

Lu C et al.

Nature Communications, 2015

26689913 (PubMed )
Supplement: ncomms10086-s13.xlsx › supplementary_data_12

Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.

Martelotto LG et al.

Genome Biology, 2014

25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2

A high-throughput functional complementation assay for classification of BRCA1 missense variants.

Bouwman P et al.

Cancer Discovery, 2013

A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.

Millot GA et al.

Human Mutation, 2012

A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).

Lindor NM et al.

Human Mutation, 2012

The occurrence of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence alterations in Slovenian population.

Stegel V et al.

Bmc Medical Genetics, 2011

1–50 of 56 papers
Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."