Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.M1008V
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.M1008V

Associated Papers

The Causal Pivot: A structural approach to genetic heterogeneity and variant discovery in complex diseases.

Shaw CA et al.

American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025

40829599 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Annotations

Mutational landscape of triple-negative breast cancer in African American women.

Yao S et al.

Nature Genetics, 2025

40858906 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2025_2322_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx › Suppl.Table7

VarMeter2: An enhanced structure-based method for predicting pathogenic missense variants through Mahalanobis distance.

Ohno S et al.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2025

40160862 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Sheet1

Using Portuguese BRCA pathogenic variation as a model to study the impact of human admixture on human health.

Andaluz S et al.

Bmc Genomics, 2024

38671360 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12864_2024_10311_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › BRCA1

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.

Keskin Karakoyun H et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2023

36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

BRCA1 Norway: comparison of classification for BRCA1 germline variants detected in families with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer between different laboratories.

Hovland HN et al.

Familial Cancer, 2022

Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Dorling L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2022

35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15

Human BRCA pathogenic variants were originated during recent human history.

Li J et al.

Life Science Alliance, 2022

35165121 (PubMed )
Supplement: LSA-2021-01263_TableS1.xlsx › Sheet3

Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.

Pasche E et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022

35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf

Precision cancer genome testing needs proficiency testing involving all stakeholders.

Maekawa M et al.

Scientific Reports, 2022

Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.

Reza MN et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1

Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Cancers, 2021

34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A

Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.

Özkan S et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021

34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4

The Frequency of Discordant Variant Classification in the Human Gene Mutation Database: A Comparison of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines and ClinVar.

Park KJ et al.

Laboratory Medicine, 2021

Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide.

Hirotsu Y et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020

32486089 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-21-03895-s001.zip › Supplemental_Table_2.xlsx › Momozawa_et_al.

Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".

Dines JN et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020

31911673 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_740_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › 1._Used_in_analysis

Germline Pathogenic Variants in 7636 Japanese Patients With Prostate Cancer and 12 366 Controls.

Momozawa Y et al.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020

31214711 (PubMed )
Supplement: djz124_supplementary_data.zip › djz124-Suppl_Data › Supplementary_Tables_5_and_6_060619.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_6

Gene panel screening for insight towards breast cancer susceptibility in different ethnicities.

Bishop MR et al.

Plos One, 2020

32866190 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0238295.s002.xlsx › S2_Table

Predicting the Disease Risk of Protein Mutation Sequences With Pre-training Model.

Li K et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2020

33408741 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_2.XLSX › Sheet1

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.

Yost S et al.

Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019

31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_2

Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.

Brown AL et al.

Plos Computational Biology, 2019

31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark

Tumor mutational profile of triple negative breast cancer patients in Thailand revealed distinctive genetic alteration in chromatin remodeling gene.

Niyomnaitham S et al.

Peerj, 2019

30828495 (PubMed )
Supplement: peerj-07-6501-s001.xlsx › BRCA1

A research-based gene panel to investigate breast, ovarian and prostate cancer genetic risk.

Bishop MR et al.

Plos One, 2019

Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.

Ernst C et al.

Bmc Medical Genomics, 2018

29580235 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12920_2018_353_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Classified_Variant_Set

A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.

Qian D et al.

Plos One, 2018

30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants

Genetics of breast cancer in African populations: a literature review.

Abbad A et al.

Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics, 2018

A comparative study of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening methods in use in 20 European clinical diagnostic laboratories.

Ellison G et al.

British Journal of Cancer, 2017

Molecular characterization, homology modeling and docking studies of the R2787H missense variation in BRCA2 gene: Association with breast cancer.

Riahi A et al.

Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2016

The role of targeted BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation analysis in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families of Portuguese ancestry.

Peixoto A et al.

Clinical Genetics, 2015

Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.

Martelotto LG et al.

Genome Biology, 2014

25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2

Clinical characteristics of ovarian cancer classified by BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51C status.

Cunningham JM et al.

Scientific Reports, 2014

24504028 (PubMed )
Supplement: srep04026-s1.pdf

BRCA1, TP53, and CHEK2 germline mutations in uterine serous carcinoma.

Pennington KP et al.

Cancer, 2013

A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.

Millot GA et al.

Human Mutation, 2012

High prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in unselected Nigerian breast cancer patients.

Fackenthal JD et al.

International Journal of Cancer, 2012

A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).

Lindor NM et al.

Human Mutation, 2012

Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral.

Tavtigian SV et al.

Journal of Medical Genetics, 2006

Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.

Judkins T et al.

Cancer Research, 2005

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in clinical genetic testing: the characterization of the clinical significance of genetic variants and their application in clinical research for BRCA1.

Judkins T et al.

Mutation Research, 2005

Truncating BRCA1 mutations are uncommon in a cohort of hereditary prostate cancer families with evidence of linkage to 17q markers.

Zuhlke KA et al.

Clinical Cancer Research : an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2004

Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.

Abkevich V et al.

Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004

Understanding germ-line mutations in BRCA1.

Szabo CI et al.

Cancer Biology & Therapy, 2004

Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."