Associated Papers
Genomic Landscape of Normal and Breast Cancer Tissues in a Hungarian Pilot Cohort.
Pipek O et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023
37239898 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-24-08553-s001.zip › Supp_Fig_1_new.pdf
SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.
Canson DM et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023
37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants
Ethnic-specificity, evolution origin and deleteriousness of Asian BRCA variation revealed by over 7500 BRCA variants derived from Asian population.
Qin Z et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2023
36385461 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-152-1159-s009.xlsx › Benign
APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.
Walker LC et al.
Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023
36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3
MARGINAL: An Automatic Classification of Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes Using a Machine Learning Model.
Karalidou V et al.
Biomolecules, 2022
36358902 (PubMed )
Supplement: biomolecules-12-01552-s001.zip › final_annotation_file_CanVaS.xlsx › Sheet1
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A et al.
Cancers, 2021
34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.
Tian Y et al.
Scientific Reports, 2019
31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.
Shamsani J et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019
30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1
Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.
Yost S et al.
Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019
31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_2
A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.
Qian D et al.
Plos One, 2018
30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants
Dealing With BRCA1/2 Unclassified Variants in a Cancer Genetics Clinic: Does Cosegregation Analysis Help?
Zuntini R et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2018
Functional Interaction Between BRCA1 and DNA Repair in Yeast May Uncover a Role of RAD50, RAD51, MRE11A, and MSH6 Somatic Variants in Cancer Development.
Maresca L et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2018
Novel BRCA1 and BRCA2 Tumor Test as Basis for Treatment Decisions and Referral for Genetic Counselling of Patients with Ovarian Carcinomas.
Weren RD et al.
Human Mutation, 2017
27767231 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-38-226-s002.xlsx › SupplementaryTable4
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2
A high-throughput functional complementation assay for classification of BRCA1 missense variants.
Bouwman P et al.
Cancer Discovery, 2013
Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance in unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: the WECARE study.
Borg A et al.
Human Mutation, 2010
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
BRCA1/2 mutations in Swiss patients with familial or early-onset breast and ovarian cancer.
Schoumacher F et al.
Swiss Medical Weekly, 2001
BRCA1 R841W: a strong candidate for a common mutation with moderate phenotype.
Barker DF et al.
Genetic Epidemiology, 1996
Select a paper to view details