Associated Papers
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
39767183 (PubMed )
Supplement: diagnostics-14-02821-s001.zip › diagnostics-3307629-supplementary_Table.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_S1
Unrecognised actionability for breast cancer risk variants identified in a national-level review of Australian familial cancer centres.
Fortuno C et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics : Ejhg, 2024
39402389 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41431_2024_1705_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › BRCA1
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast/Ovarian Cancer: Mysterious Signals From the Genome.
Fanale D et al.
Frontiers in Oncology, 2021
Determination of Pathogenicity of Breast Cancer 1 Gene Variants using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology Guidelines.
Brown A et al.
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 2019
REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.
Tian Y et al.
Scientific Reports, 2019
31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Bhaskaran SP et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2019
30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › BRCA1_ethnic_source_
A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.
Qian D et al.
Plos One, 2018
30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants
Germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Turkish breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer patients.
Manguoğlu E et al.
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, 2010
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.
Abkevich V et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004
Select a paper to view details