Associated Papers
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
39767183 (PubMed )
Supplement: diagnostics-14-02821-s001.zip › diagnostics-3307629-supplementary_Table.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_S1
Pathogenic variants in human DNA damage repair genes mostly arose in recent human history.
Zhao B et al.
Bmc Cancer, 2024
38575974 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12885_2024_12160_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15
Human BRCA pathogenic variants were originated during recent human history.
Li J et al.
Life Science Alliance, 2022
35165121 (PubMed )
Supplement: LSA-2021-01263_TableS1.xlsx › Sheet3
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
The Genetic Analyses of French Canadians of Quebec Facilitate the Characterization of New Cancer Predisposing Genes Implicated in Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Families.
Fierheller CT et al.
Cancers, 2021
34298626 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03406-s001.zip › cancers-1247507-supplementary › Supplementary_Tables_V12_18062021_REFs.xlsx › Supp_Table_2
Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort.
Li H et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
31853058 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_729_MOESM2_ESM.xls › Sheet1
REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.
Tian Y et al.
Scientific Reports, 2019
31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.
Qian D et al.
Plos One, 2018
30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants
Multi-platform molecular profiling of a large cohort of glioblastomas reveals potential therapeutic strategies.
Xiu J et al.
Oncotarget, 2016
26933808 (PubMed )
Supplement: oncotarget-07-21556-s001.pdf
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2
Evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence, risk prediction models and a multistep testing approach in French-Canadian families with high risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Simard J et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2007
Natural selection and mammalian BRCA1 sequences: elucidating functionally important sites relevant to breast cancer susceptibility in humans.
Burk-Herrick A et al.
Mammalian Genome : Official Journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2006
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
Single nucleotide polymorphisms in clinical genetic testing: the characterization of the clinical significance of genetic variants and their application in clinical research for BRCA1.
Judkins T et al.
Mutation Research, 2005
Select a paper to view details