Associated Papers
VarMeter2: An enhanced structure-based method for predicting pathogenic missense variants through Mahalanobis distance.
Ohno S et al.
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2025
40160862 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Sheet1
SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.
Canson DM et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023
37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants
APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.
Walker LC et al.
Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023
36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2
Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.
Keskin Karakoyun H et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2023
36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.
Qorri E et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022
35887294 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-07946-s001.zip › Supplementary_Table_S3.xlsx › BRCA1_Dataset
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A et al.
Cancers, 2021
34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.
Shamsani J et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019
30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1
Genetic variants of prospectively demonstrated phenocopies in BRCA1/2 kindreds.
Dominguez-Valentin M et al.
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 2018
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2
Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants on splicing: clues from an allelic imbalance study.
Caux-Moncoutier V et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics : Ejhg, 2009
Select a paper to view details