Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.A622V
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.A622V

Associated Papers

Clinical syndromes linked to biallelic germline variants in MCM8 and MCM9.

Helderman NC et al.

Hgg Advances, 2025

40684266 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc1.pdf

VarMeter2: An enhanced structure-based method for predicting pathogenic missense variants through Mahalanobis distance.

Ohno S et al.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2025

40160862 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Sheet1

Population-based BRCA germline mutation screening in the Han Chinese identifies individuals at risk of BRCA mutation-related cancer: experience from a clinical diagnostic center from greater Shanghai area.

Wu Z et al.

Bmc Cancer, 2024

38566028 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12885_2024_12089_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › ACMG_Classification

F-box DNA Helicase 1 (FBH1) Contributes to the Destabilization of DNA Damage Repair Machinery in Human Cancers.

Watson AJ et al.

Cancers, 2023

BRCA2 Germline Mutations Identify Gastric Cancers Responsive to PARP Inhibitors.

Petrelli A et al.

Cancer Research, 2023

37129948 (PubMed )
Supplement: can-22-2620_supplementary_table_s2_suppst2.pdf

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S2.output

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.

Keskin Karakoyun H et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2023

36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

MARGINAL: An Automatic Classification of Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes Using a Machine Learning Model.

Karalidou V et al.

Biomolecules, 2022

36358902 (PubMed )
Supplement: biomolecules-12-01552-s001.zip › final_annotation_file_CanVaS.xlsx › Sheet1

BRCA1 Norway: comparison of classification for BRCA1 germline variants detected in families with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer between different laboratories.

Hovland HN et al.

Familial Cancer, 2022

Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Dorling L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2022

35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15

Genomic landscape of advanced endometrial cancer analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing and the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) dataset.

Hong JH et al.

Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2022

35128859 (PubMed )
Supplement: jgo-33-e29-s002.xls › jgo-33-e29-s002

Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.

Pasche E et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022

35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf

Validation and Data-Integration of Yeast-Based Assays for Functional Classification of BRCA1 Missense Variants.

Bellè F et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022

35409408 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-04049-s001.zip › Table_S1.xlsx › Table_S1

Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.

Reza MN et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1

Pathogenic nsSNPs that increase the risks of cancers among the Orang Asli and Malays.

Khoruddin NA et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34373545 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_95618_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Training_Dataset

Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Cancers, 2021

34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A

Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.

Özkan S et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021

34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4

The Frequency of Discordant Variant Classification in the Human Gene Mutation Database: A Comparison of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines and ClinVar.

Park KJ et al.

Laboratory Medicine, 2021

Variant profiling of colorectal adenomas from three patients of two families with MSH3-related adenomatous polyposis.

Perne C et al.

Plos One, 2021

34843512 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0259185.s008.xlsx › Tabelle1

Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide.

Hirotsu Y et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020

32486089 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-21-03895-s001.zip › Supplemental_Table_2.xlsx › Momozawa_et_al.

Predicting the Disease Risk of Protein Mutation Sequences With Pre-training Model.

Li K et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2020

33408741 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_2.XLSX › Sheet1

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.

Bhaskaran SP et al.

International Journal of Cancer, 2019

30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › BRCA1_ethnic_source_

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.

Yost S et al.

Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019

31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_1

Clinically Actionable Insights into Initial and Matched Recurrent Glioblastomas to Inform Novel Treatment Approaches.

Ellis HP et al.

Journal of Oncology, 2019

32082376 (PubMed )
Supplement: 4878547.f1.zip › 4878547.f1 › Ellis_et_al_SNVs_041018_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › TableS7_TCGA_mutatons

Somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations are early events in sporadic endometrial and colorectal carcinogenesis, determining driver mutational landscape, clonal neoantigen burden and immune response.

Temko D et al.

The Journal of Pathology, 2018

29604063 (PubMed )
Supplement: PATH-245-283-s021.xlsx › EC.Drivers.Edited

Unexpected cancer-predisposition gene variants in Cowden syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome patients without underlying germline PTEN mutations.

Yehia L et al.

Plos Genetics, 2018

29684080 (PubMed )
Supplement: pgen.1007352.s010.xlsx › S9_Table

Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.

Ernst C et al.

Bmc Medical Genomics, 2018

29580235 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12920_2018_353_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Classified_Variant_Set

A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.

Qian D et al.

Plos One, 2018

30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants

[A bioinformatic pipeline for NGS data analysis and mutation calling in human solid tumors].

Tsukanov KY et al.

Biomeditsinskaia Khimiia, 2017

Findings of a 1303 Korean whole-exome sequencing study.

Kwak SH et al.

Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 2017

28706299 (PubMed )
Supplement: emm2017142x4.xls › Table_S1

Longitudinal analysis of treatment-induced genomic alterations in gliomas.

Erson-Omay EZ et al.

Genome Medicine, 2017

28153049 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2017_401_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › AllMutations_Clonality

Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.

Martelotto LG et al.

Genome Biology, 2014

25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2

Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types.

Kandoth C et al.

Nature, 2013

24132290 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41586_2013_BFnature12634_MOESM82_ESM.zip › nature12634-s1 › Supplementary_Table_5.xlsx › S_Table_5

A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.

Millot GA et al.

Human Mutation, 2012

1–50 of 57 papers
Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."