Associated Papers
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
39767183 (PubMed )
Supplement: diagnostics-14-02821-s001.zip › diagnostics-3307629-supplementary_Table.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_S1
SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.
Canson DM et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023
37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants
APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.
Walker LC et al.
Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023
36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A et al.
Cancers, 2021
34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A
Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort.
Li H et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
31853058 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_729_MOESM2_ESM.xls › Sheet1
Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Bhaskaran SP et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2019
30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › Total_BRCA1___BRCA2
A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.
Shamsani J et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019
30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1
Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.
Yost S et al.
Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019
31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_2
Unexpected cancer-predisposition gene variants in Cowden syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome patients without underlying germline PTEN mutations.
Yehia L et al.
Plos Genetics, 2018
29684080 (PubMed )
Supplement: pgen.1007352.s010.xlsx › S9_Table
Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types.
Lu C et al.
Nature Communications, 2015
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2
Select a paper to view details