Associated Papers
VarMeter2: An enhanced structure-based method for predicting pathogenic missense variants through Mahalanobis distance.
Ohno S et al.
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2025
40160862 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Sheet1
Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.
Keskin Karakoyun H et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2023
36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
Predicting the Disease Risk of Protein Mutation Sequences With Pre-training Model.
Li K et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2020
33408741 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_2.XLSX › Sheet1
REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.
Tian Y et al.
Scientific Reports, 2019
31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Bhaskaran SP et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2019
30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › Total_BRCA1___BRCA2
Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.
Ernst C et al.
Bmc Medical Genomics, 2018
29580235 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12920_2018_353_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Classified_Variant_Set
A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.
Qian D et al.
Plos One, 2018
30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants
A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.
Millot GA et al.
Human Mutation, 2012
A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).
Lindor NM et al.
Human Mutation, 2012
Diagnostic guidelines for high-resolution melting curve (HRM) analysis: an interlaboratory validation of BRCA1 mutation scanning using the 96-well LightScanner.
van der Stoep N et al.
Human Mutation, 2009
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
Select a paper to view details