Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.P334L
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.P334L

Associated Papers

Precision in prediction: tailoring machine learning models for breast cancer missense variants pathogenicity prediction.

Ahmad RM et al.

Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2025

41263939 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_materials_bbaf611_1_.zip › Supplementary_materials_bbaf611 › Supplementary_Table_S8.xlsx › Sheet1

VarMeter2: An enhanced structure-based method for predicting pathogenic missense variants through Mahalanobis distance.

Ohno S et al.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2025

40160862 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Sheet1

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.

Keskin Karakoyun H et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2023

36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.

Qorri E et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022

35887294 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-07946-s001.zip › Supplementary_Table_S3.xlsx › BRCA1_Dataset

Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Dorling L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2022

35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15

Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.

Pasche E et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022

35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf

Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.

Reza MN et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1

Pathogenic nsSNPs that increase the risks of cancers among the Orang Asli and Malays.

Khoruddin NA et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34373545 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_95618_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Training_Dataset

Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Cancers, 2021

34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A

Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.

Özkan S et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021

34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4

Predicting the Disease Risk of Protein Mutation Sequences With Pre-training Model.

Li K et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2020

33408741 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_2.XLSX › Sheet1

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.

Bhaskaran SP et al.

International Journal of Cancer, 2019

30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › Total_BRCA1___BRCA2

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.

Yost S et al.

Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019

31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_1

Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.

Brown AL et al.

Plos Computational Biology, 2019

31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark

Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.

Ernst C et al.

Bmc Medical Genomics, 2018

29580235 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12920_2018_353_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Classified_Variant_Set

A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.

Qian D et al.

Plos One, 2018

30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants

Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.

Martelotto LG et al.

Genome Biology, 2014

25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2

A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.

Millot GA et al.

Human Mutation, 2012

A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS).

Lindor NM et al.

Human Mutation, 2012

Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants on splicing: clues from an allelic imbalance study.

Caux-Moncoutier V et al.

European Journal of Human Genetics : Ejhg, 2009

Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.

Judkins T et al.

Cancer Research, 2005

Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."