Associated Papers
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
39767183 (PubMed )
Supplement: diagnostics-14-02821-s001.zip › diagnostics-3307629-supplementary_Table.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_S1
DNA repair function scores for 2172 variants in the BRCA1 amino-terminus.
Diabate M et al.
Plos Genetics, 2023
37578980 (PubMed )
Supplement: pgen.1010739.s013.xlsx › Sheet1
SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.
Canson DM et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023
37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants
Ethnic-specificity, evolution origin and deleteriousness of Asian BRCA variation revealed by over 7500 BRCA variants derived from Asian population.
Qin Z et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2023
36385461 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-152-1159-s002.xlsx › BRCA1
APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.
Walker LC et al.
Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023
36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15
Homologous recombination deficiency in diverse cancer types and its correlation with platinum chemotherapy efficiency in ovarian cancer.
Wen H et al.
Bmc Cancer, 2022
35578198 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12885_2022_9602_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx › Table_S6
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A et al.
Cancers, 2021
34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A
Pan-cancer whole-genome analyses of metastatic solid tumours.
Priestley P et al.
Nature, 2019
31645765 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41586_2019_1689_MOESM14_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.
Shamsani J et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019
30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1
Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.
Brown AL et al.
Plos Computational Biology, 2019
31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.
Abkevich V et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004
Select a paper to view details