Associated Papers
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.
Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
Artificial intelligence-based recognition for variant pathogenicity of BRCA1 using AlphaFold2-predicted structures.
Li C et al.
Theranostics, 2023
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2.
Sangree AK et al.
Nature Communications, 2022
Quantifying prediction of pathogenicity for within-codon concordance (PM5) using 7541 functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2 missense variants.
Loong L et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022
A functionally impaired missense variant identified in French Canadian families implicates FANCI as a candidate ovarian cancer-predisposing gene.
Fierheller CT et al.
Genome Medicine, 2021
Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders.
Rowlands C et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A et al.
Cancers, 2021
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
Blood RNA analysis can increase clinical diagnostic rate and resolve variants of uncertain significance.
Wai HA et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort.
Li H et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
Germline Pathogenic Variants in Homologous Recombination and DNA Repair Genes in an Asian Cohort of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer.
Toh MR et al.
Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2018
Incidence of BRCA1 somatic mutations and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese women with triple-negative breast cancer.
Li M et al.
Gene, 2016
Massively Parallel Functional Analysis of BRCA1 RING Domain Variants.
Starita LM et al.
Genetics, 2015
Novel recurrently mutated genes and a prognostic mutation signature in colorectal cancer.
Yu J et al.
Gut, 2015
Mutational analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families from Asturias (Northern Spain).
Blay P et al.
Bmc Cancer, 2013
Prediction of single-nucleotide substitutions that result in exon skipping: identification of a splicing silencer in BRCA1 exon 6.
Raponi M et al.
Human Mutation, 2011
Genetic analysis of BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase activity and its relationship to breast cancer susceptibility.
Morris JR et al.
Human Molecular Genetics, 2006
Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.
Abkevich V et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004