Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.R71M
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.R71M

Associated Papers

Precision in prediction: tailoring machine learning models for breast cancer missense variants pathogenicity prediction.

Ahmad RM et al.

Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2025

41263939 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_materials_bbaf611_1_.zip › Supplementary_materials_bbaf611 › Supplementary_Table_S8.xlsx › Sheet1

Comprehensive germline and somatic profiling of high-risk Thai breast cancer via next-generation sequencing.

Kamdee K et al.

Scientific Reports, 2025

40181060 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2025_95834_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › S._Data_2.

Identification of potentially actionable genetic variants in epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Fieuws C et al.

Npj Precision Oncology, 2024

38519644 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41698_2024_565_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Germline mutations of 4567 patients with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer spectrum in Thailand.

Kansuttiviwat C et al.

Npj Genomic Medicine, 2024

DNA repair function scores for 2172 variants in the BRCA1 amino-terminus.

Diabate M et al.

Plos Genetics, 2023

37578980 (PubMed )
Supplement: pgen.1010739.s013.xlsx › Sheet1

SpliceVault predicts the precise nature of variant-associated mis-splicing.

Dawes R et al.

Nature Genetics, 2023

36747048 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2022_1293_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Table_2_RNA_studies__n_58_

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.

Qorri E et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022

35887294 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-07946-s001.zip › Supplementary_Table_S3.xlsx › BRCA1_Dataset

Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders.

Rowlands C et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34663891 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_99747_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table-S1-modified

Blood RNA analysis can increase clinical diagnostic rate and resolve variants of uncertain significance.

Wai HA et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020

32123317 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2020_766_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Variant_summary

Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort.

Li H et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020

31853058 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41436_2019_729_MOESM2_ESM.xls › Sheet1

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.

Findlay GM et al.

Nature, 2018

30209399 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1501643-supplement-2.xlsx › Sheet1

A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.

Qian D et al.

Plos One, 2018

30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants

Exome sequencing covers >98% of mutations identified on targeted next generation sequencing panels.

LaDuca H et al.

Plos One, 2017

28152038 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0170843.s003.xlsx › S3_Table
Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."