Associated Papers
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.
Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
40233743 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Hoja1
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T7
Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2.
Sangree AK et al.
Nature Communications, 2022
35288574 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2022_28884_MOESM10_ESM.xlsx › variant-ABE_library_annotation
Quantifying prediction of pathogenicity for within-codon concordance (PM5) using 7541 functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2 missense variants.
Loong L et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022
34906453 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc1.xlsx › Sup_Table_3_Variantdata
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
Identification of pathogenic variants in cancer genes using base editing screens with editing efficiency correction.
Huang C et al.
Genome Biology, 2021
33691754 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2021_2305_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx › Table_S6
Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.
Findlay GM et al.
Nature, 2018
30209399 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1501643-supplement-2.xlsx › Sheet1
Evaluation of an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing panel for detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants.
Shin S et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016
Select a paper to view details