Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA1
Variant:p.D67Y
Back to variants list

BRCA1

NM_007294.4:p.D67Y

Associated Papers

A scalable approach to resolving variants of uncertain significance.

Tejura M et al.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology, 2026

41727046 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-7.xlsx › VarChAMP_data_supp_mat_PP

Functional assessment of protein variants in structured domains by fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy.

Mateu-Regué À et al.

Scientific Reports, 2026

Triple-Action Therapy: Combining Machine Learning, Docking, and Dynamics to Combat BRCA1-Mutated Breast Cancer.

Zainulabidin AA et al.

Molecular Biotechnology, 2025

ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.

Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.

American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025

40233743 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Hoja1

VarMeter2: An enhanced structure-based method for predicting pathogenic missense variants through Mahalanobis distance.

Ohno S et al.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2025

40160862 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Sheet1

Functional Characterization of the Human BRCA1 ∆11 Splicing Isoforms in Yeast.

Galli A et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024

All exons are not created equal-exon vulnerability determines the effect of exonic mutations on splicing.

Holm LL et al.

Nucleic Acids Research, 2024

38324470 (PubMed )
Supplement: gkae077_supplemental_files.zip › supplementary_tables.xlsx › Supplementary_table_S1_-_ESM_DB

Genomic analysis of advanced breast cancer tumors from talazoparib-treated gBRCA1/2mut carriers in the ABRAZO study.

Turner NC et al.

Npj Breast Cancer, 2023

37803017 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41523_2023_561_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

DNA repair function scores for 2172 variants in the BRCA1 amino-terminus.

Diabate M et al.

Plos Genetics, 2023

37578980 (PubMed )
Supplement: pgen.1010739.s005.xlsx › Sheet1

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.

Keskin Karakoyun H et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2023

36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant

Refinement of the assignment to the ACMG/AMP BS3 and PS3 criteria of eight BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance by integrating available functional data with protein interaction assays.

Caleca L et al.

Frontiers in Oncology, 2023

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

BRCA1 Norway: comparison of classification for BRCA1 germline variants detected in families with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer between different laboratories.

Hovland HN et al.

Familial Cancer, 2022

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.

Qorri E et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022

35887294 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-07946-s001.zip › Supplementary_Table_S3.xlsx › BRCA1_Dataset

Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Dorling L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2022

35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S15

Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.

Pasche E et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022

35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf

Pathogenic BRCA1 variants disrupt PLK1-regulation of mitotic spindle orientation.

He Z et al.

Nature Communications, 2022

Validation and Data-Integration of Yeast-Based Assays for Functional Classification of BRCA1 Missense Variants.

Bellè F et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022

35409408 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-04049-s001.zip › Table_S1.xlsx › Table_S1

Quantifying prediction of pathogenicity for within-codon concordance (PM5) using 7541 functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2 missense variants.

Loong L et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022

34906453 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc1.xlsx › Sup_Table_3_Variantdata

BRCA1/ATF1-Mediated Transactivation is Involved in Resistance to PARP Inhibitors and Cisplatin.

Endo S et al.

Cancer Research Communications, 2021

Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.

Reza MN et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1

Spectrum of Germline Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1/2 Genes in the Apulian Southern Italy Population: Geographic Distribution and Evidence for Targeted Genetic Testing.

Patruno M et al.

Cancers, 2021

34572941 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-04714-s001.zip › cancers-1331888-supplementary.pdf

Pathogenic nsSNPs that increase the risks of cancers among the Orang Asli and Malays.

Khoruddin NA et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34373545 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_95618_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Training_Dataset

Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.

Özkan S et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021

34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4

Functional analysis of BRCA1 RING domain variants: computationally derived structural data can improve upon experimental features for training predictive models.

Masso M

Integrative Biology : Quantitative Biosciences From Nano to Macro, 2020

Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide.

Hirotsu Y et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020

32486089 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-21-03895-s001.zip › Supplemental_Table_2.xlsx › ARUP

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.

Brown AL et al.

Plos Computational Biology, 2019

31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark
1–50 of 113 papers
Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."