Associated Papers
All exons are not created equal-exon vulnerability determines the effect of exonic mutations on splicing.
Holm LL et al.
Nucleic Acids Research, 2024
38324470 (PubMed )
Supplement: gkae077_supplemental_files.zip › supplementary_tables.xlsx › Supplementary_table_S1_-_ESM_DB
DNA repair function scores for 2172 variants in the BRCA1 amino-terminus.
Diabate M et al.
Plos Genetics, 2023
37578980 (PubMed )
Supplement: pgen.1010739.s005.xlsx › Sheet1
Ethnic-specificity, evolution origin and deleteriousness of Asian BRCA variation revealed by over 7500 BRCA variants derived from Asian population.
Qin Z et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2023
36385461 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-152-1159-s002.xlsx › BRCA1
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T7
Are transient protein-protein interactions more dispensable?
Ghadie MA et al.
Plos Computational Biology, 2022
35404956 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1010013.s002.xlsx › _D__Lit-SI_disMut_edgotypes
Quantifying prediction of pathogenicity for within-codon concordance (PM5) using 7541 functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2 missense variants.
Loong L et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022
34906453 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc1.xlsx › Sup_Table_3_Variantdata
The BRCA1/BARD1 ubiquitin ligase and its substrates.
Witus SR et al.
The Biochemical Journal, 2021
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
Clinical phenotypes combined with saturation genome editing identifying the pathogenicity of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance in breast cancer.
Wan Q et al.
Familial Cancer, 2021
Predicting the Disease Risk of Protein Mutation Sequences With Pre-training Model.
Li K et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2020
33408741 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_2.XLSX › Sheet1
Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Bhaskaran SP et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2019
30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › Total_BRCA1___BRCA2
Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.
Brown AL et al.
Plos Computational Biology, 2019
31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark
Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.
Findlay GM et al.
Nature, 2018
30209399 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1501643-supplement-2.xlsx › Sheet1
GEMO, a National Resource to Study Genetic Modifiers of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers.
Lesueur F et al.
Frontiers in Oncology, 2018
30430080 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_2.XLSX › Supplementary_Table_2
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2
Select a paper to view details