Associated Papers
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.
Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
40233743 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Hoja1
DNA repair function scores for 2172 variants in the BRCA1 amino-terminus.
Diabate M et al.
Plos Genetics, 2023
37578980 (PubMed )
Supplement: pgen.1010739.s013.xlsx › Sheet1
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T7
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34207612 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-06226-s001.zip › SUPP_FIGURES_TABLES › SupplementaryTable4.xlsx › supp_table4
Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.
Findlay GM et al.
Nature, 2018
30209399 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1501643-supplement-2.xlsx › Sheet1
Massively Parallel Functional Analysis of BRCA1 RING Domain Variants.
Starita LM et al.
Genetics, 2015
Multifactorial likelihood assessment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants confirms that BRCA1:c.122A>G(p.His41Arg) is a pathogenic mutation.
Whiley PJ et al.
Plos One, 2014
Interpretation of mRNA splicing mutations in genetic disease: review of the literature and guidelines for information-theoretical analysis.
Caminsky N et al.
F1000research, 2014
25717368 (PubMed )
Supplement: f1000research-3-6038-s0000.tgz › e0d3facd-5877-477e-9217-8c5aa68746f2_Supplementary-Tables-11112014.zip › Supplementary-Tables-and-Figures-11112014 › Supplementary_Table_10._Splicing_Mutation_Calculator_Source_Datav2.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_10
Screening for genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Czech high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients: high proportion of population specific alterations in BRCA1 gene.
Ticha I et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010
Characterization of BRCA1 ring finger variants of uncertain significance.
Sweet K et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010
Genetic analysis of BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase activity and its relationship to breast cancer susceptibility.
Morris JR et al.
Human Molecular Genetics, 2006
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.
Abkevich V et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004
Select a paper to view details