Associated Papers
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.
Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
Unrecognised actionability for breast cancer risk variants identified in a national-level review of Australian familial cancer centres.
Fortuno C et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics : Ejhg, 2024
Protein-folding chaperones predict structure-function relationships and cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
Gracia B et al.
Cell Reports, 2024
DNA repair function scores for 2172 variants in the BRCA1 amino-terminus.
Diabate M et al.
Plos Genetics, 2023
A Multicenter Study of Genotype Variation/Demographic Patterns in 2475 Individuals Including 1444 Cases With Breast Cancer in Turkey.
Boga I et al.
European Journal of Breast Health, 2023
Refinement of the assignment to the ACMG/AMP BS3 and PS3 criteria of eight BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance by integrating available functional data with protein interaction assays.
Caleca L et al.
Frontiers in Oncology, 2023
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.
Pasche E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
Functional Categorization of BRCA1 Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance in Homologous Recombination Repair Complementation Assays.
Bouwman P et al.
Clinical Cancer Research : an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020
Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.
Yost S et al.
Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019
Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.
Findlay GM et al.
Nature, 2018
Massively Parallel Functional Analysis of BRCA1 RING Domain Variants.
Starita LM et al.
Genetics, 2015
Multifactorial likelihood assessment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants confirms that BRCA1:c.122A>G(p.His41Arg) is a pathogenic mutation.
Whiley PJ et al.
Plos One, 2014
Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance in unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: the WECARE study.
Borg A et al.
Human Mutation, 2010
Characterization of BRCA1 ring finger variants of uncertain significance.
Sweet K et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010
Genetic analysis of BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase activity and its relationship to breast cancer susceptibility.
Morris JR et al.
Human Molecular Genetics, 2006
Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
Judkins T et al.
Cancer Research, 2005
Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.
Abkevich V et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2004