Associated Papers
When two plus four does not equal six: Combining computational and functional evidence to classify BRCA1 key domain missense substitutions.
Pew ST et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.
Ramadane-Morchadi L et al.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025
When Two plus Four Does Not Equal Six: Combining Computational and Functional Evidence to Classify BRCA1 Key Domain Missense Substitutions.
Pew ST et al.
Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2025
Reinterpretation of Conflicting ClinVar BRCA1 Missense Variants Using VarSome and CanVIG-UK Gene-Specific Guidance.
So MK et al.
Diagnostics (basel, Switzerland), 2024
Using multiplexed functional data to reduce variant classification inequities in underrepresented populations.
Dawood M et al.
Genome Medicine, 2024
Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.
Padigepati SR et al.
Human Genetics, 2024
DNA repair function scores for 2172 variants in the BRCA1 amino-terminus.
Diabate M et al.
Plos Genetics, 2023
Refinement of the assignment to the ACMG/AMP BS3 and PS3 criteria of eight BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance by integrating available functional data with protein interaction assays.
Caleca L et al.
Frontiers in Oncology, 2023
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2.
Sangree AK et al.
Nature Communications, 2022
Quantifying prediction of pathogenicity for within-codon concordance (PM5) using 7541 functional classifications of BRCA1 and MSH2 missense variants.
Loong L et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
Correlation between ZBRK1/ZNF350 gene polymorphism and breast cancer.
Wu J et al.
Bmc Medical Genomics, 2021
Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort.
Li H et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020
Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Bhaskaran SP et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2019
GFP-Fragment Reassembly Screens for the Functional Characterization of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Protein Interaction Domains of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes.
Caleca L et al.
Cancers, 2019
Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.
Findlay GM et al.
Nature, 2018
Analytical Validation of a Hybrid Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Genomic Profiling of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA.
Clark TA et al.
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : Jmd, 2018
The relationship between the CYP2D6 polymorphisms and tamoxifen efficacy in adjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer patients in Chinese Han population.
Lan B et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2018
Compromised BRCA1-PALB2 interaction is associated with breast cancer risk.
Foo TK et al.
Oncogene, 2017
Genetic mutations in von Willebrand disease identified by DHPLC and DNA sequence analysis.
Kakela JK et al.
Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 2006