Associated Papers
In Silico Prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants with Conflicting Clinical Interpretation in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.
Stella S et al.
Genes, 2024
CDH1 Genotype Exploration in Women With Hereditary Lobular Breast Cancer Phenotype.
Corso G et al.
Jama Network Open, 2024
38652475 (PubMed )
Supplement: jamanetwopen-e247862-s001.pdf
Understanding and predicting the functional consequences of missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Aljarf R et al.
Scientific Reports, 2022
35729312 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2022_13508_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S16
Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer.
G V et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2022
36561320 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table2.xlsx › BRCA2
Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide.
Hirotsu Y et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020
32486089 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-21-03895-s001.zip › Supplemental_Table_2.xlsx › Momozawa_et_al.
Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: Evidence from over 30,000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Bhaskaran SP et al.
International Journal of Cancer, 2019
30702160 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-145-962-s006.xlsx › BRCA2_ethnic_sources_
Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7,051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls.
Momozawa Y et al.
Nature Communications, 2018
30287823 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2018_6581_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx › SD1
Select a paper to view details