Associated Papers
Exploring Co-occurring POLE Exonuclease and Non-exonuclease Domain Mutations and Their Impact on Tumor Mutagenicity.
Shah SM et al.
Cancer Research Communications, 2024
38282550 (PubMed )
Supplement: crc-23-0312-s02.xlsx › Fig3A_CRC_data
Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.
Keskin Karakoyun H et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2023
36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant
Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.
Thomassen M et al.
Human Mutation, 2022
35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.
Qorri E et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022
35887294 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-07946-s001.zip › Supplementary_Table_S4.xlsx › BRCA2_Dataset
Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Dorling L et al.
Genome Medicine, 2022
35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S16
Cancer-causing BRCA2 missense mutations disrupt an intracellular protein assembly mechanism to disable genome maintenance.
Lee M et al.
Nucleic Acids Research, 2021
33978741 (PubMed )
Supplement: gkab308_supplemental_file.pdf
Prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in 22 cancer susceptibility genes in Swedish pediatric cancer patients.
von Stedingk K et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
33674644 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_84502_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › S10_All_Variants
A computational model for classification of BRCA2 variants using mouse embryonic stem cell-based functional assays.
Biswas K et al.
Npj Genomic Medicine, 2020
Genetic testing in Poland and Ukraine: should comprehensive germline testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 be recommended for women with breast and ovarian cancer?
Nguyen-Dumont T et al.
Genetics Research, 2020
The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome.
Ochoa D et al.
Nature Biotechnology, 2020
31819260 (PubMed )
Supplement: EMS84831-supplement-Table_S5.xlsx › clinvar_data
REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.
Tian Y et al.
Scientific Reports, 2019
31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
Toward automation of germline variant curation in clinical cancer genetics.
Ravichandran V et al.
Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019
30787465 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1525468-supplement-Large_Excel_File.xlsx › Table_S6
Insights into BRCA Cancer Predisposition from Integrated Germline and Somatic Analyses in 7632 Cancers.
Yost S et al.
Jnci Cancer Spectrum, 2019
31360904 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_pkz028.zip › 20181104_Supplementary_Tables.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_2
A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.
Qian D et al.
Plos One, 2018
30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.
Martelotto LG et al.
Genome Biology, 2014
25348012 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13059_2014_484_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Additional_file_2
Select a paper to view details