Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA2
Variant:p.L2647P
Back to variants list

BRCA2

NM_000059.4:p.L2647P

Associated Papers

Precision in prediction: tailoring machine learning models for breast cancer missense variants pathogenicity prediction.

Ahmad RM et al.

Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2025

41263939 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_materials_bbaf611_1_.zip › Supplementary_materials_bbaf611 › Supplementary_Table_S8.xlsx › Sheet1

Germline Testing in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Analysis Comparing Strengths and Challenges of Different Approaches.

Marabelli M et al.

Cancers, 2025

40361347 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-17-01419-s001.zip › Table_S6.xlsx › Foglio1

Saturation genome editing-based clinical classification of BRCA2 variants.

Sahu S et al.

Nature, 2025

Functional evaluation and clinical classification of BRCA2 variants.

Huang H et al.

Nature, 2025

39779857 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41586_2024_8388_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Table_S4A

Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.

Padigepati SR et al.

Human Genetics, 2024

39085601 (PubMed )
Supplement: 439_2024_2691_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › BRCA2

Patient-Derived Tumor Xenograft Study with CDK4/6 Inhibitor Plus AKT Inhibitor for the Management of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Kase AM et al.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 2024

Clinicopathological characteristics and eligibility for adjuvant olaparib of germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with HER2-negative early breast cancer.

Morganti S et al.

Npj Breast Cancer, 2024

38627457 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41523_2024_632_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Functional analysis and clinical classification of 462 germline BRCA2 missense variants affecting the DNA binding domain.

Hu C et al.

American Journal of Human Genetics, 2024

Detection of Germline Mutations in a Cohort of 250 Relatives of Mutation Carriers in Multigene Panel: Impact of Pathogenic Variants in Other Genes beyond BRCA1/2.

Di Rado S et al.

Cancers, 2023

In silico and structure-based assessment to classify VUS identified in the α-helical domain of BRCA2.

Khan MA et al.

Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 2023

36404616 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplement_1.pdf

The pathogenic role of the BRCA2 c.7847C>T (p.Ser2616Phe) variant in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition.

Yamazawa K et al.

Cancer Science, 2023

37067535 (PubMed )
Supplement: CAS-114-2993-s001.pdf

Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.

Keskin Karakoyun H et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2023

36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant

Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach.

Thomassen M et al.

Human Mutation, 2022

35979650 (PubMed )
Supplement: HUMU-43-1921-s002.XLSX › Supp_T3

Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay.

Hu C et al.

Clinical Cancer Research : an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.

Qorri E et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022

35887294 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-23-07946-s001.zip › Supplementary_Table_S4.xlsx › BRCA2_Dataset

An integrative model for the comprehensive classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Iversen ES et al.

Npj Genomic Medicine, 2022

35665744 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41525_2022_302_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › BRCA2_inSilico_PCs___AGVGD

Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Dorling L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2022

35585550 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2022_1052_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants.

Pasche E et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2022

35274687 (PubMed )
Supplement: btac146_supplementary_data.pdf

Evaluation of a Four-Gene Panel for Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment.

Secondino A et al.

Genes, 2022

Risks of breast and ovarian cancer for women harboring pathogenic missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 compared with those harboring protein truncating variants.

Li H et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022

Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Cancers, 2021

34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A

Study of the Genetic Variants in BRCA1/2 and Non-BRCA Genes in a Population-Based Cohort of 2155 Breast/Ovary Cancer Patients, Including 443 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients, in Argentina.

Solano AR et al.

Cancers, 2021

34072659 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-02711-s001.zip › cancers-1233266-supplementary.pdf

Strong functional data for pathogenicity or neutrality classify BRCA2 DNA-binding-domain variants of uncertain significance.

Richardson ME et al.

American Journal of Human Genetics, 2021

Analysis of Italian BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants Identifies a Private Spectrum in the Population from the Bergamo Province in Northern Italy.

Figlioli G et al.

Cancers, 2021

33573335 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-00532-s001.zip › cancers-1044931-supplementary.xlsx › Suppl_Table

Targeted Therapy of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comprehensive Genomic Analysis.

Hescheler DA et al.

Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2021

34630336 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table_1.xlsx › Tab2

A computational model for classification of BRCA2 variants using mouse embryonic stem cell-based functional assays.

Biswas K et al.

Npj Genomic Medicine, 2020

High-throughput functional evaluation of BRCA2 variants of unknown significance.

Ikegami M et al.

Nature Communications, 2020

32444794 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2020_16141_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

The functional impact of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2.

Mesman RLS et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019

GFP-Fragment Reassembly Screens for the Functional Characterization of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Protein Interaction Domains of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes.

Caleca L et al.

Cancers, 2019

Comprehensive annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants by functionally validated sequence-based computational prediction models.

Hart SN et al.

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019

Characterization of spliceogenic variants located in regions linked to high levels of alternative splicing: BRCA2 c.7976+5G > T as a case study.

Montalban G et al.

Human Mutation, 2018

Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.

Ernst C et al.

Bmc Medical Genomics, 2018

29580235 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12920_2018_353_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Classified_Variant_Set
1–50 of 58 papers
Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."