Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:BRCA2
Variant:p.M2952V
Back to variants list

BRCA2

NM_000059.4:p.M2952V

Associated Papers

Precision in prediction: tailoring machine learning models for breast cancer missense variants pathogenicity prediction.

Ahmad RM et al.

Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2025

41263939 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_materials_bbaf611_1_.zip › Supplementary_materials_bbaf611 › Supplementary_Table_S8.xlsx › Sheet1

Establishing the First Genetic Variant Registry for Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Colombia: Insights and Implications.

Deugd R et al.

Diseases (basel, Switzerland), 2025

40710012 (PubMed )
Supplement: diseases-13-00222-s001.zip › diseases-3616972-supplementary.pdf

SpliceAI-10k calculator for the prediction of pseudoexonization, intron retention, and exon deletion.

Canson DM et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023

37021934 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad179_supplementary_data.zip › SAI10kcalc_supp_tables_final.xlsx › S1.variants

APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP.

Walker LC et al.

Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2023

36865205 (PubMed )
Supplement: media-10.xlsx › Table_S2

Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer.

G V et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2022

36561320 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table2.xlsx › BRCA2

Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.

Moles-Fernández A et al.

Cancers, 2021

34283047 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-03341-s001.zip › 2_Supplementary_table_S2A_2B.xlsx › Suppl_Table_2A

Germline Pathogenic Variants in 7636 Japanese Patients With Prostate Cancer and 12 366 Controls.

Momozawa Y et al.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020

31214711 (PubMed )
Supplement: djz124_supplementary_data.zip › djz124-Suppl_Data › Supplementary_Tables_5_and_6_060619.xlsx › Supplementary_Table_6

REVEL and BayesDel outperform other in silico meta-predictors for clinical variant classification.

Tian Y et al.

Scientific Reports, 2019

31484976 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2019_49224_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity.

Shamsani J et al.

Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2019

30475984 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty960_supplementary_data.zip › bty960-Suppl_data › Supplementary_Table_S1.xlsx › Sheet1

A Bayesian framework for efficient and accurate variant prediction.

Qian D et al.

Plos One, 2018

30212499 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0203553.s008.xlsx › Variants

In silico, in vitro and case-control analyses as an effective combination for analyzing BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants in a population-based sample.

Rodríguez-Balada M et al.

Cancer Genetics, 2016

Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."