Associated Papers
Comparative outcome and prognostic factor analysis among MDS/AML patients with TP53 mutations, snps, and wild type.
Yang X et al.
Human Genomics, 2025
40877983 (PubMed )
Supplement: 40246_2025_792_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S4
Characterization of CEBPA Mutations and Polymorphisms and their Prognostic Relevance in De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.
Sarojam S et al.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : Apjcp, 2015
Double CEBPA mutations are prognostically favorable in non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia patients with wild-type NPM1 and FLT3-ITD.
Wen XM et al.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 2014
CEBPA single mutation can be a possible favorable prognostic indicator in NPM1 and FLT3-ITD wild-type acute myeloid leukemia patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk.
Park SH et al.
Leukemia Research, 2013
Prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in a large cohort of younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: impact of double CEBPA mutations and the interaction with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations.
Green CL et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010
Select a paper to view details