Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:RPTOR
Variant:p.A862T
Back to variants list

RPTOR

NM_020761.3:p.A862T

Associated Papers

Clinical Validation of Local Versus Commercial Genomic Testing in Cancer: A Comparison of Tissue and Plasma Concordance.

Faulkner LG et al.

Cancer Investigation, 2025

39989311 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplement_1.pdf

Altered cytoplasmic and nuclear ADP-ribosylation levels analyzed with an improved ADP-ribose binder are a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.

Schraml P et al.

The Journal of Pathology. Clinical Research, 2023

36999983 (PubMed )
Supplement: CJP2-9-273-s001.xlsx › Tumor_16

Genomic Analysis of Tumors from Patients with Glioblastoma with Long-Term Response to Afatinib.

Owen S et al.

Oncotargets and Therapy, 2022

Next-Generation Sequencing-Directed Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer in Routine Clinical Practice.

Bruzas S et al.

Cancers, 2021

34572791 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-04564-s001.zip › cancers-1336427-supplementary › Supplementary_material › Table_S1_-_Genetic_alterations_identified_by_NGS_in_95_patients_with_metastatic_breast_cancer.xlsx › Table_S1

Clinicopathological and Genomic Profiles of Atypical Fibroxanthoma and Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma Identify Overlapping Signatures with a High Mutational Burden.

Ak M et al.

Genes, 2021

34202213 (PubMed )
Supplement: genes-12-00974-s001.zip › Supplemental_Table_S2_F1CDx_gene_alteration.xlsx › Tabelle1

Distinct genomic subclasses of high-grade/progressive meningiomas: NF2-associated, NF2-exclusive, and NF2-agnostic.

Williams EA et al.

Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 2020

33087175 (PubMed )
Supplement: 40478_2020_1040_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Targeting HER2 in colorectal cancer: The landscape of amplification and short variant mutations in ERBB2 and ERBB3.

Ross JS et al.

Cancer, 2018

29338072 (PubMed )
Supplement: CNCR-124-1358-s002.xlsx › Colon

Actionable perturbations of damage responses by TCL1/ATM and epigenetic lesions form the basis of T-PLL.

Schrader A et al.

Nature Communications, 2018

29449575 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2017_2688_MOESM20_ESM.xlsx › d__Freq_TP093

A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.

Sun JX et al.

Plos Computational Biology, 2018

29415044 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1005965.s006.pdf

Not All Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostics are Created Equal: Understanding the Nuances of Solid Tumor Assay Design for Somatic Mutation Detection.

Gray PN et al.

Cancers, 2015

Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."