Associated Papers
TP53 variant clusters stratify phenotypic diversity in germline carriers and reveal an osteosarcoma-prone subgroup.
Fischer NW et al.
Nature Communications, 2025
41022739 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2025_63528_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
Using multiplexed functional data to reduce variant classification inequities in underrepresented populations.
Dawood M et al.
Genome Medicine, 2024
39627863 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2024_1392_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Table_S18
TP53 germline pathogenic variants in modern humans were likely originated during recent human history.
Kou SH et al.
Nar Cancer, 2023
37304756 (PubMed )
Supplement: zcad025_supplemental_files.zip › Supplementary_Table_2.xlsx › BVs
vaRHC: an R package for semi-automation of variant classification in hereditary cancer genes according to ACMG/AMP and gene-specific ClinGen guidelines.
Munté E et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2023
36916756 (PubMed )
Supplement: btad128_supplementary_data.zip › btad128_Supplementary_Data › Supplementary_tables10022023.xlsx › ST12-TP53
Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer.
Keskin Karakoyun H et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2023
36896237 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table1.xlsx › clinvar_breastcancer_allvariant
Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer.
G V et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2022
36561320 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table2.xlsx › TP53
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_3.xlsx › Sheet1
Association between Predicted Effects of TP53 Missense Variants on Protein Conformation and Their Phenotypic Presentation as Li-Fraumeni Syndrome or Hereditary Breast Cancer.
Liu Y et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
TP53 germline mutations in the context of families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a clinical challenge.
Grill S et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021
Identification and functional characterization of new missense SNPs in the coding region of the TP53 gene.
Doffe F et al.
Cell Death and Differentiation, 2021
33257846 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41418_2020_672_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Table_S2c
c-Myc inactivation of p53 through the pan-cancer lncRNA MILIP drives cancer pathogenesis.
Feng YC et al.
Nature Communications, 2020
33020477 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2020_18735_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
From uncertainty to pathogenicity: clinical and functional interrogation of a rare TP53 in-frame deletion.
Quinn EA et al.
Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies, 2019
30886117 (PubMed )
Supplement: supp_mcs.a003921_Supplemental_Table_1a.xlsx › S_Table1a._TP53_in_ClinVar
Targeted massively parallel sequencing of a panel of putative breast cancer susceptibility genes in a large cohort of multiple-case breast and ovarian cancer families.
Li J et al.
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2016
C-terminal modifications regulate MDM2 dissociation and nuclear export of p53.
Carter S et al.
Nature Cell Biology, 2007
SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting.
Rodriguez MS et al.
The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
Select a paper to view details