Associated Papers
Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations.
Funk JS et al.
Nature Genetics, 2025
39774325 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2024_2039_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx › SuppFig6
Comprehensive Identification of Deleterious TP53 Missense VUS Variants Based on Their Impact on TP53 Structural Stability.
Tam B et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34768775 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-11345-s001.zip › Supplementary_table › Supplementary_table_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_3.xlsx › Sheet1
TP53 inactivation and expression of methylation-associated proteins in gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation.
Yatagai N et al.
Virchows Archiv : an International Journal of Pathology, 2019
appreci8: a pipeline for precise variant calling integrating 8 tools.
Sandmann S et al.
Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 2018
29945233 (PubMed )
Supplement: bty518_supplementary_data_s10.xlsx › TP_Mutations
Next-generation sequencing analysis for gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation: emphasis on the relationship with hepatoid adenocarcinoma.
Akazawa Y et al.
Human Pathology, 2018
TP53 exon-6 truncating mutations produce separation of function isoforms with pro-tumorigenic functions.
Shirole NH et al.
Elife, 2016
27759562 (PubMed )
Supplement: elife-17929-supp2.xlsx › Sheet3
Select a paper to view details