Associated Papers
TP53 mutation heterogeneity reveals distinct prognoses in mantle cell lymphoma.
Liu S et al.
Annals of Hematology, 2026
41559357 (PubMed )
Supplement: 277_2026_6771_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TableS3
Comparative Analysis of a Dual DNA-RNA Panel and a DNA-Only Panel for Sarcoma: Real-World Data From a Nationwide Genomic Database.
Nakata E et al.
Cancer Science, 2026
41128349 (PubMed )
Supplement: CAS-117-156-s003.xlsx › Sheet1
TP53 variant clusters stratify phenotypic diversity in germline carriers and reveal an osteosarcoma-prone subgroup.
Fischer NW et al.
Nature Communications, 2025
41022739 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2025_63528_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
Comparative outcome and prognostic factor analysis among MDS/AML patients with TP53 mutations, snps, and wild type.
Yang X et al.
Human Genomics, 2025
40877983 (PubMed )
Supplement: 40246_2025_792_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S8
Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations.
Funk JS et al.
Nature Genetics, 2025
39774325 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2024_2039_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx › SuppFig6
Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.
Padigepati SR et al.
Human Genetics, 2024
39085601 (PubMed )
Supplement: 439_2024_2691_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TP53
Diverse rescue potencies of p53 mutations to ATO are predetermined by intrinsic mutational properties.
Song H et al.
Science Translational Medicine, 2023
Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer.
G V et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2022
36561320 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table2.xlsx › TP53
Comprehensive Identification of Deleterious TP53 Missense VUS Variants Based on Their Impact on TP53 Structural Stability.
Tam B et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021
34768775 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-11345-s001.zip › Supplementary_table › Supplementary_table_1.xlsx › Sheet1
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_3.xlsx › Sheet1
From uncertainty to pathogenicity: clinical and functional interrogation of a rare TP53 in-frame deletion.
Quinn EA et al.
Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies, 2019
30886117 (PubMed )
Supplement: supp_mcs.a003921_Supplemental_Table_1a.xlsx › S_Table1a._TP53_in_ClinVar
Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.
Brown AL et al.
Plos Computational Biology, 2019
31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark
Heterogeneous responses and resistant mechanisms to crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Kang J et al.
Thoracic Cancer, 2018
29978950 (PubMed )
Supplement: TCA-9-1093-s006.xlsx › Sheet1
Structure-Based Analysis Reveals Cancer Missense Mutations Target Protein Interaction Interfaces.
Engin HB et al.
Plos One, 2016
27043210 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0152929.s003.xlsx › mut_effects_per_ppi
Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine.
Van Allen EM et al.
Nature Medicine, 2014
24836576 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS531666-supplement-10.xlsx › Sheet1
Assessment of computational methods for predicting the effects of missense mutations in human cancers.
Gnad F et al.
Bmc Genomics, 2013
23819521 (PubMed )
Supplement: 1471-2164-14-S3-S7-S1.xlsx › COSMIC
Epidemiology of doublet/multiplet mutations in lung cancers: evidence that a subset arises by chronocoordinate events.
Chen Z et al.
Plos One, 2008
19005564 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0003714.s006.xls › Table_S-4
Select a paper to view details