Associated Papers
Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations.
Funk JS et al.
Nature Genetics, 2025
39774325 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2024_2039_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx › SuppFig6
Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.
Padigepati SR et al.
Human Genetics, 2024
39085601 (PubMed )
Supplement: 439_2024_2691_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TP53
Comprehensive classification of TP53 somatic missense variants based on their impact on p53 structural stability.
Tam B et al.
Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2024
39140857 (PubMed )
Supplement: table_s1_bbae400.xlsx › Sheet1
Landscape of somatic alterations in large-scale solid tumors from an Asian population.
Wu L et al.
Nature Communications, 2022
35871175 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2022_31780_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx › Supplementary_Data_4
Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer.
G V et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2022
36561320 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table2.xlsx › EGFR
Functionally impactful TP53 mutations are associated with increased risk of extranodal extension in clinically advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Gleber-Netto FO et al.
Cancer, 2020
Heterogeneous responses and resistant mechanisms to crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Kang J et al.
Thoracic Cancer, 2018
29978950 (PubMed )
Supplement: TCA-9-1093-s006.xlsx › Sheet1
Validation and utilisation of high-coverage next-generation sequencing to deliver the pharmacological audit trail.
Ong M et al.
British Journal of Cancer, 2014
TP53 mutations in human cancer: database reassessment and prospects for the next decade.
Leroy B et al.
Human Mutation, 2014
24665023 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplement_1.pdf
Select a paper to view details