Associated Papers
TP53 variant clusters stratify phenotypic diversity in germline carriers and reveal an osteosarcoma-prone subgroup.
Fischer NW et al.
Nature Communications, 2025
41022739 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2025_63528_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1
TP53 minigene analysis of 161 sequence changes provides evidence for role of spatial constraint and regulatory elements on variant-induced splicing impact.
Canson DM et al.
Npj Genomic Medicine, 2025
40341019 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41525_2025_498_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Data_S2
Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations.
Funk JS et al.
Nature Genetics, 2025
39774325 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2024_2039_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx › SuppFig6
Comprehensive classification of TP53 somatic missense variants based on their impact on p53 structural stability.
Tam B et al.
Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2024
39140857 (PubMed )
Supplement: table_s1_bbae400.xlsx › Sheet1
Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.
Brown AL et al.
Plos Computational Biology, 2019
31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark
Structure-Based Analysis Reveals Cancer Missense Mutations Target Protein Interaction Interfaces.
Engin HB et al.
Plos One, 2016
27043210 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0152929.s003.xlsx › mut_effects_per_ppi
ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer.
Toy W et al.
Nature Genetics, 2013
24185512 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS531250-supplement-2.xlsx › All_samples_N_36_
Assessment of computational methods for predicting the effects of missense mutations in human cancers.
Gnad F et al.
Bmc Genomics, 2013
23819521 (PubMed )
Supplement: 1471-2164-14-S3-S7-S1.xlsx › COSMIC
Select a paper to view details