Varaico: Literature-Extracted Genetic Variants

Gene:TP53
Variant:p.P190T
Back to variants list

TP53

NM_000546.6:p.P190T

Associated Papers

TP53 mutation heterogeneity reveals distinct prognoses in mantle cell lymphoma.

Liu S et al.

Annals of Hematology, 2026

41559357 (PubMed )
Supplement: 277_2026_6771_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TableS3

Identification of high-risk signatures and therapeutic targets through molecular characterization and immune profiling of TP53-mutant breast cancer.

Paulino PJIV et al.

Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology, 2025

41386839 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc5.xlsx › Table_S3

Somatic mutation and selection at population scale.

Lawson ARJ et al.

Nature, 2025

41062696 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41586_2025_9584_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx › clinvar_annotation

Precancerous Cells Initiate Glioblastoma Evolution and Contribute to Intratumoral Heterogeneity.

Kim HJ et al.

Cancer Discovery, 2025

40233712 (PubMed )
Supplement: cd-24-0234_supplementary_figures_s1-s15_suppsf1.pdf

Stratified Medicine Pediatrics: Cell-Free DNA and Serial Tumor Sequencing Identifies Subtype-Specific Cancer Evolution and Epigenetic States.

George SL et al.

Cancer Discovery, 2025

39693475 (PubMed )
Supplement: cd-24-0916_supplementary_table_5_suppst5.xlsx › Sheet1

Clinicogenomic landscape of pancreatic adenocarcinoma identifies KRAS mutant dosage as prognostic of overall survival.

Varghese AM et al.

Nature Medicine, 2025

39753968 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41591_2024_3362_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › SupplementaryTable2_IMPACT_Alts

Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations.

Funk JS et al.

Nature Genetics, 2025

39774325 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2024_2039_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx › SuppFig6

Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.

Padigepati SR et al.

Human Genetics, 2024

39085601 (PubMed )
Supplement: 439_2024_2691_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TP53

Clinical and molecular predictors of very late recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

Richman J et al.

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2024

38709373 (PubMed )
Supplement: 10549_2024_7311_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Suppl_Table_5

Immunohistochemistry screening for TP53 mutation in myeloid neoplasms in AZF-fixed bone marrow biopsies.

Yang G et al.

Pathology, 2024

Novel oncogenic transcriptional targets of mutant p53 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

George SA et al.

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2024

Comparison of TP53 mutations in myelodysplasia and acute leukemia suggests divergent roles in initiation and progression.

Jambhekar A et al.

Blood Neoplasia, 2024

40453522 (PubMed )
Supplement: BNEO_NEO-2023-000115-mmc1.xlsx › MDS

Exploring Co-occurring POLE Exonuclease and Non-exonuclease Domain Mutations and Their Impact on Tumor Mutagenicity.

Shah SM et al.

Cancer Research Communications, 2024

38282550 (PubMed )
Supplement: crc-23-0312-s02.xlsx › Fig3B_EC_data

Longitudinal detection of somatic mutations in the saliva of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-affected patients: a pilot study.

Dal Secco C et al.

Frontiers in Oncology, 2024

TP53 missense mutation reveals gain-of-function properties in small-sized KRAS transformed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Zhou Y et al.

Journal of Translational Medicine, 2023

38037073 (PubMed )
Supplement: 12967_2023_4742_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Concordance between cancer gene alterations in tumor and circulating tumor DNA correlates with poor survival in a real-world precision-medicine population.

Rosenberg S et al.

Molecular Oncology, 2023

36694946 (PubMed )
Supplement: MOL2-17-1844-s003.xlsx › 2a.Studied_gene

Adult Low-Hypodiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Emerges from Preleukemic TP53-Mutant Clonal Hematopoiesis.

Kim R et al.

Blood Cancer Discovery, 2023

36630200 (PubMed )
Supplement: bcd-22-0154_supplementary_tables_s1-s11_suppst1-st11.xlsx › TableS2

Locally Performed HRD Testing for Ovarian Cancer? Yes, We Can!

Magliacane G et al.

Cancers, 2022

Repurposing antiparasitic antimonials to noncovalently rescue temperature-sensitive p53 mutations.

Tang Y et al.

Cell Reports, 2022

Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer.

G V et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, 2022

36561320 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table2.xlsx › TP53

Comprehensive Identification of Deleterious TP53 Missense VUS Variants Based on Their Impact on TP53 Structural Stability.

Tam B et al.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021

34768775 (PubMed )
Supplement: ijms-22-11345-s001.zip › Supplementary_table › Supplementary_table_1.xlsx › Sheet1

Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.

Reza MN et al.

Scientific Reports, 2021

34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_3.xlsx › Sheet1

The Mutational Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Predicts Responses and Outcomes in Elderly Patients from the PETHEMA-FLUGAZA Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Ayala R et al.

Cancers, 2021

34070172 (PubMed )
Supplement: cancers-13-02458-s001.zip › cancers-1203671-supplementary › Table_S8.xlsx › Hoja2

Development of BRAF V600E Mutation in NRAS Q61L Mutated Rectal Cancer.

Cao MN et al.

Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, 2021

Clinical implications of plasma circulating tumor DNA in gynecologic cancer patients.

Charo LM et al.

Molecular Oncology, 2021

32881280 (PubMed )
Supplement: MOL2-15-67-s001.docx

Personalized cancer therapy prioritization based on driver alteration co-occurrence patterns.

Mateo L et al.

Genome Medicine, 2020

32907621 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2020_774_MOESM1_ESM.zip › SupplementaryTables › TableS2.xlsx › Biomarkers

Resectable lung lesions malignancy assessment and cancer detection by ultra-deep sequencing of targeted gene mutations in plasma cell-free DNA.

Peng M et al.

Journal of Medical Genetics, 2019

30981987 (PubMed )
Supplement: jmedgenet-2018-105825supp001.xlsx › Table_S3

From uncertainty to pathogenicity: clinical and functional interrogation of a rare TP53 in-frame deletion.

Quinn EA et al.

Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies, 2019

30886117 (PubMed )
Supplement: supp_mcs.a003921_Supplemental_Table_1a.xlsx › S_Table1a._TP53_in_ClinVar

Exome and immune cell score analyses reveal great variation within synchronous primary colorectal cancers.

Hänninen UA et al.

British Journal of Cancer, 2019

30894686 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41416_2019_427_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Characterization of frequently mutated cancer genes in Chinese breast tumors: a comparison of Chinese and TCGA cohorts.

Zhang G et al.

Annals of Translational Medicine, 2019

Target sequencing of cancer-related genes in early esophageal squamous neoplasia resected by endoscopic resection in Japanese patients.

Kobayashi S et al.

Oncotarget, 2018

High prevalence of focal and multi-focal somatic genetic variants in the human brain.

Keogh MJ et al.

Nature Communications, 2018

30323172 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2018_6331_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1

Contribution of allelic imbalance to colorectal cancer.

Palin K et al.

Nature Communications, 2018

30202008 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2018_6132_MOESM11_ESM.xlsx › Somatic_mutations_in_234_MSS_CR

Diffuse Staining for Activated NOTCH1 Correlates With NOTCH1 Mutation Status and Is Associated With Worse Outcome in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Sajed DP et al.

The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2017

Particular gene upregulation and p53 heterogeneous expression in TP53-mutated maxillary carcinoma.

Kudo I et al.

Oncology Letters, 2017

Sporadic Early-Onset Diffuse Gastric Cancers Have High Frequency of Somatic CDH1 Alterations, but Low Frequency of Somatic RHOA Mutations Compared With Late-Onset Cancers.

Cho SY et al.

Gastroenterology, 2017

28522256 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1058936-supplement-Table_S3.xlsx › VCF

Targeted next generation sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound acquired cytology from ampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinoma has the potential to aid patient stratification for optimal therapy selection.

Gleeson FC et al.

Oncotarget, 2016

27203738 (PubMed )
Supplement: oncotarget-07-54526-s001.pdf

Impact of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53 status and intraindividual mutation heterogeneity on outcome after liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases.

Løes IM et al.

International Journal of Cancer, 2016

26991344 (PubMed )
Supplement: IJC-139-647-s003.xls › Suppl_Tbl_2

Complex karyotypes and KRAS and POT1 mutations impact outcome in CLL after chlorambucil-based chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.

Herling CD et al.

Blood, 2016

Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics.

Reva B et al.

Nucleic Acids Research, 2011

21727090 (PubMed )
Supplement: supp_gkr407_Supplement2_Table_SM1_COSMIC_mutations.xls › Sheet1

p53 mutation, but not in vitro predictor genes of therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin, is clinically relevant in comparing partial and complete responder cases of maxillary squamous cell carcinoma.

Kudo I et al.

Oncology Reports, 2010

Isolation of temperature-sensitive p53 mutations from a comprehensive missense mutation library.

Shiraishi K et al.

The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2004

Single-step DGGE-based mutation scanning of the p53 gene: application to genetic diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Guldberg P et al.

Human Mutation, 1997

Select a paper to view details
UCSC Genome Browser·Imprint·Privacy·Terms·Feedback·Email Updates·

Regarding the variants extracted from papers and shown text snippets from research papers, the following holds: "Some rights reserved. This work permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited."