Associated Papers
TP53 mutation heterogeneity reveals distinct prognoses in mantle cell lymphoma.
Liu S et al.
Annals of Hematology, 2026
41559357 (PubMed )
Supplement: 277_2026_6771_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TableS3
Neoantigenic properties of TP53 variants influence cancer risk in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Montellier E et al.
Ebiomedicine, 2026
41370968 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Table_S1
A quantitative, Bayesian-informed approach to gene-specific variant classification: Updated Expert Panel recommendations improve classification of TP53 germline variants for Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Fortuno C et al.
Genome Medicine, 2025
41126324 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2025_1536_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S2
Clinicogenomic landscape of pancreatic adenocarcinoma identifies KRAS mutant dosage as prognostic of overall survival.
Varghese AM et al.
Nature Medicine, 2025
39753968 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41591_2024_3362_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › SupplementaryTable2_IMPACT_Alts
Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations.
Funk JS et al.
Nature Genetics, 2025
39774325 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2024_2039_MOESM12_ESM.xlsx › Fig7b_d
The impact of mutations on TP53 protein and MicroRNA expression in HNSCC: Novel insights for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Mahmoud AA et al.
Plos One, 2025
40333905 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0307859.s001.xlsx › Sheet10
Clustering of TP53 variants into functional classes correlates with cancer risk and identifies different phenotypes of Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Montellier E et al.
Iscience, 2024
39634561 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › TableS1
Real-world routine diagnostic molecular analysis for TP53 mutational status is recommended over p53 immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas.
de Haan LM et al.
Virchows Archiv : an International Journal of Pathology, 2024
37851120 (PubMed )
Supplement: 428_2023_3676_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx › Sheet1__2_
Multi-omics profiling of longitudinal samples reveals early genomic changes in follicular lymphoma.
Bai B et al.
Blood Cancer Journal, 2024
39191762 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41408_2024_1124_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S3
Comprehensive classification of TP53 somatic missense variants based on their impact on p53 structural stability.
Tam B et al.
Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2024
39140857 (PubMed )
Supplement: table_s1_bbae400.xlsx › Sheet1
Influence of TP53 mutation on efficacy and survival in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Zhang Z et al.
Medcomm, 2024
38832214 (PubMed )
Supplement: MCO2-5-e586-s001.docx
Comparison of TP53 mutations in myelodysplasia and acute leukemia suggests divergent roles in initiation and progression.
Jambhekar A et al.
Blood Neoplasia, 2024
40453522 (PubMed )
Supplement: BNEO_NEO-2023-000115-mmc1.xlsx › AML
RBFOX2 modulates a metastatic signature of alternative splicing in pancreatic cancer.
Jbara A et al.
Nature, 2023
36949200 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1897967-supplement-1897967_Supp_table_1.xlsx › clin_data_PDA_Patients
Different impacts of TP53 mutations on cell cycle-related gene expression among cancer types.
Sasaki K et al.
Scientific Reports, 2023
36964217 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2023_32092_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Suppl._Table_S4
NF1 loss of function as an alternative initiating event in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Ramakrishnan G et al.
Cell Reports, 2022
36351408 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1848910-supplement-2.xlsx › NF1-TP53-pi16INK4A-Smad4
Repurposing antiparasitic antimonials to noncovalently rescue temperature-sensitive p53 mutations.
Tang Y et al.
Cell Reports, 2022
TP53_PROF: a machine learning model to predict impact of missense mutations in TP53.
Ben-Cohen G et al.
Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022
35043155 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_s1_bbab524.xlsx › S1A._Positive_Set
Circulating tumour DNA in metastatic breast cancer to guide clinical trial enrolment and precision oncology: A cohort study.
Zivanovic Bujak A et al.
Plos Medicine, 2020
33001984 (PubMed )
Supplement: pmed.1003363.s013.xlsx › S4_Table
Identification of relevant genetic alterations in cancer using topological data analysis.
Rabadán R et al.
Nature Communications, 2020
32732999 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41467_2020_17659_MOESM3_ESM.xls › TableS1
A Three-dimensional Ex Vivo Viability Assay Reveals a Strong Correlation Between Response to Targeted Inhibitors and Mutation Status in Melanoma Lymph Node Metastases.
Flørenes VA et al.
Translational Oncology, 2019
31096111 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc1.xlsx › Blad1
Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes.
Brown AL et al.
Plos Computational Biology, 2019
31034466 (PubMed )
Supplement: pcbi.1006981.s010.xlsx › final_benchmark
Immunophenotypic dysplasia and aberrant T-cell antigen expression in acute myeloid leukaemia with complex karyotype and TP53 mutations.
Dannheim KC et al.
Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2018
Targeting HER2 in colorectal cancer: The landscape of amplification and short variant mutations in ERBB2 and ERBB3.
Ross JS et al.
Cancer, 2018
29338072 (PubMed )
Supplement: CNCR-124-1358-s002.xlsx › Colon
p53 mutation status is a primary determinant of placenta-specific protein 1 expression in serous ovarian cancers.
Devor EJ et al.
International Journal of Oncology, 2017
The tumor suppressor capability of p53 is dependent on non-muscle myosin IIA function in head and neck cancer.
Coaxum SD et al.
Oncotarget, 2017
Mutations of CREBBP and SOCS1 are independent prognostic factors in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: mutational analysis of the SAKK 38/07 prospective clinical trial cohort.
Juskevicius D et al.
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 2017
28302137 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13045_2017_438_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Selected_mutations_2016.08.22
p53 mutations experimentally induced by 8-methoxypsoralen plus UVA (PUVA) differ from those found in human skin cancers in PUVA-treated patients.
Monti P et al.
Mutagenesis, 2000
Select a paper to view details