Associated Papers
Neoantigenic properties of TP53 variants influence cancer risk in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Montellier E et al.
Ebiomedicine, 2026
41370968 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › Table_S1
A quantitative, Bayesian-informed approach to gene-specific variant classification: Updated Expert Panel recommendations improve classification of TP53 germline variants for Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Fortuno C et al.
Genome Medicine, 2025
41126324 (PubMed )
Supplement: 13073_2025_1536_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Table_S2
TP53 minigene analysis of 161 sequence changes provides evidence for role of spatial constraint and regulatory elements on variant-induced splicing impact.
Canson DM et al.
Npj Genomic Medicine, 2025
40341019 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41525_2025_498_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › Data_S2
Germline Variants in Patients Affected by Both Uveal and Cutaneous Melanoma.
Johansson PA et al.
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, 2025
39315505 (PubMed )
Supplement: PCMR-38-0-s002.xlsx › Table_S2
Clustering of TP53 variants into functional classes correlates with cancer risk and identifies different phenotypes of Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Montellier E et al.
Iscience, 2024
39634561 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › TableS1
Scalable approaches for generating, validating and incorporating data from high-throughput functional assays to improve clinical variant classification.
Padigepati SR et al.
Human Genetics, 2024
39085601 (PubMed )
Supplement: 439_2024_2691_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TP53
Concordance between cancer gene alterations in tumor and circulating tumor DNA correlates with poor survival in a real-world precision-medicine population.
Rosenberg S et al.
Molecular Oncology, 2023
36694946 (PubMed )
Supplement: MOL2-17-1844-s003.xlsx › 2a.Studied_gene
Challenging interpretation of germline TP53 variants based on the experience of a national comprehensive cancer centre.
Butz H et al.
Scientific Reports, 2023
Different impacts of TP53 mutations on cell cycle-related gene expression among cancer types.
Sasaki K et al.
Scientific Reports, 2023
36964217 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2023_32092_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx › Suppl._table_S1
Characterizing isoform switching events in esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Zhang Y et al.
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids, 2022
36090744 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc1.pdf
TP53_PROF: a machine learning model to predict impact of missense mutations in TP53.
Ben-Cohen G et al.
Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022
35043155 (PubMed )
Supplement: supplementary_table_s1_bbab524.xlsx › S1B._Negative_Set
Analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer.
G V et al.
Frontiers in Genetics, 2022
36561320 (PubMed )
Supplement: Table2.xlsx › TP53
Pathogenic genetic variants from highly connected cancer susceptibility genes confer the loss of structural stability.
Reza MN et al.
Scientific Reports, 2021
34584144 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41598_2021_98547_MOESM1_ESM.zip › Supplementary_files-5-8-21 › Supplementary_file_3.xlsx › Sheet1
Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of patients with hypermutant lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Zhang H et al.
Oncology Letters, 2021
33692861 (PubMed )
Supplement: Supplementary_Data.pdf
Genetic alterations of malignant pleural mesothelioma: association with tumor heterogeneity and overall survival.
Quetel L et al.
Molecular Oncology, 2020
32083805 (PubMed )
Supplement: MOL2-14-1207-s005.xlsx › Table_S4
Mutational processes shape the landscape of TP53 mutations in human cancer.
Giacomelli AO et al.
Nature Genetics, 2018
30224644 (PubMed )
Supplement: NIHMS1501645-supplement-4.xlsx › Giacomelli_et_al_New_Supplement
Aromatase inhibition remodels the clonal architecture of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancers.
Miller CA et al.
Nature Communications, 2016
27502118 (PubMed )
Supplement: ncomms12498-s13.xls › s11_Sheet1.tsv
Molecular dynamic simulation insights into the normal state and restoration of p53 function.
Fu T et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2012
C-terminal substitution of MDM2 interacting peptides modulates binding affinity by distinctive mechanisms.
Brown CJ et al.
Plos One, 2011
Select a paper to view details