Associated Papers
TP53 mutation heterogeneity reveals distinct prognoses in mantle cell lymphoma.
Liu S et al.
Annals of Hematology, 2026
41559357 (PubMed )
Supplement: 277_2026_6771_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx › TableS3
Evaluating Liquid Biopsy for Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detection as a Complementary Diagnostic Tool in Thyroid Cancer Among Ecuadorian Women.
Cadena-Ullauri S et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2025
Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations.
Funk JS et al.
Nature Genetics, 2025
39774325 (PubMed )
Supplement: 41588_2024_2039_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx › SuppFig6
Comprehensive classification of TP53 somatic missense variants based on their impact on p53 structural stability.
Tam B et al.
Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2024
39140857 (PubMed )
Supplement: table_s1_bbae400.xlsx › Sheet1
Integration of deep learning with Ramachandran plot molecular dynamics simulation for genetic variant classification.
Tam B et al.
Iscience, 2023
36879825 (PubMed )
Supplement: mmc2.xlsx › MLH1
Structure-Based Analysis Reveals Cancer Missense Mutations Target Protein Interaction Interfaces.
Engin HB et al.
Plos One, 2016
27043210 (PubMed )
Supplement: pone.0152929.s003.xlsx › mut_effects_per_ppi
Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics.
Reva B et al.
Nucleic Acids Research, 2011
21727090 (PubMed )
Supplement: supp_gkr407_Supplement2_Table_SM1_COSMIC_mutations.xls › Sheet1
Discriminating functional and non-functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry.
Nenutil R et al.
The Journal of Pathology, 2005
Select a paper to view details